James Duckworth vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Nov at 07:37 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Duckworth vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

AUS
3
Win
Played
0
Win

HKG
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Duckworth 3 - 0 Wong
They have played 6 sets in total, with James Duckworth winning 6 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0. The last match between James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Taipei Challenger, 08-11-2025, Round: SF, Surface: I.hard, with James Duckworth getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Duckworth | 3 |
| Wong | 0 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(SF) Taipei Challenger(11-08-25)
(R2) Yokohama Challenger(11-22-23)
(F) Playford Challenger(10-29-23)
J. Duckworth vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,878,002 | Career Prize Money | $538,970 |
| 59.77% (517-348) | Career Total W/L | 55.78% (164-130) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 23 | Titles | 2 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (8-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (5-6) |
J. Duckworth vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:
- James Duckworth has a slight edge on second serve performance, winning 48.20% of points over the last six months, compared to Chak Lam Coleman Wong's 46.90%. Will this translate into a match advantage? It often does.
- On return games, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has an edge, winning 44.97% of opponents' second serve points compared to James Duckworth's 43.93%. For first serves, Wong also leads with 23.07% over Duckworth's 20.82%.
- In terms of withstanding pressure, James Duckworth has saved 57.84% of breakpoints recently, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.52%, which could play a crucial role during pivotal moments.
- Both players have identical win-loss records over the past year, each winning 52.24% of their matches. How might this impact their upcoming meeting?
- James Duckworth excels on Clay (63% win rate) but struggles more on Grass (53%). Chak Lam Coleman Wong shines on Hard courts (63%) but has challenges on Grass (43%).
- When considering match levels, James Duckworth has faced higher-level main tour opponents, winning 53.57% of those encounters, whereas Wong has predominantly played in Challenger/ITF events, winning 56.10% of those matches.
- In direct head-to-head matchups, James Duckworth has triumphed twice against Chak Lam Coleman Wong, winning all four sets they've played. How significant is this dominance in their past meetups?
- Despite facing tougher opponents on average (rank 231.58 vs. 207.61), James Duckworth has maintained strong performance metrics, highlighting his competitive prowess.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has a slight edge, winning 43% of deciding sets compared to Duckworth's 40% in recent play.
- While historical performance is crucial, current event performance can also provide insights into form. Have these players demonstrated any notable form at this event?
Editorial Prediction (November 8, 2025, UTC):
Examining the overall statistics, James Duckworth demonstrates a marginal advantage in crucial areas such as second serve performance and pressure point resilience. These aspects often turn the tide in tight tennis matches.
Despite Chak Lam Coleman Wong's stronger return game and slightly better performance in deciding sets, Duckworth’s experience and success against higher-caliber opponents give him an overall edge.
Moreover, Duckworth's unblemished head-to-head record against Wong suggests a psychological advantage that should not be underestimated.
Considering these factors, James Duckworth appears to be the frontrunner to win this upcoming tennis match.
James Duckworth vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Duckworth vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 38 | Games Won | 18 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 17 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:12:46 | Average Match Time | 1:12:46 |
| 62% (100/162) | 1st Serve % | 50% (81/162) |
| 82% (82/100) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (57/81) |
| 58% (36/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (37/81) |
| 48% (10/21) | Break Pts Won % | 11% (1/9) |
| 42% (68/162) | Return Points Win % | 27% (44/162) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Duckworth Recent Matches Played
C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

J. Duckworth vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.77% (517/348) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.78% (164/130) |
| 57.28% (1200/895) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.07% (372/316) |
| 52.46% (10914/9889) | Games Win/Loss | 51.16% (3419/3264) |
| 60.00% (300/200) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.90% (129/90) |
| 63.37% (109/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.51% (20/23) |
| 58.76% (57/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 53.13% (51/45) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.52 |
| 5778 | Aces Total | 1687 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1900 | Total Double Faults | 603 |
| 1:27:9 | Average Match Time | 1:31:40 |
| 501.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 366.8 |
| 57% (31990/56518) | 1st Serve % | 60% (11331/18739) |
| 75% (24083/31990) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (8054/11331) |
| 53% (13079/24524) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3631/7408) |
| 38% (1819/4731) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (703/1718) |
| 36% (20873/57191) | Return Points Win % | 38% (7230/18830) |
| 37.78% (34/56) | Slam W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 52.73% (29/26) | Masters W/L | 46.67% (7/8) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 48.96% (94/98) | Main Tour W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 66.99% (280/138) | Challenger W/L | 55.65% (69/55) |
| 74.53% (79/27) | Futures W/L | 59.50% (72/49) |
| 62% (498/799) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (157/286) |
| 27% (15/55) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 54% (227/418) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (56/102) |
| 54% (158/295) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (51/94) |
| 85% (504/429) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (157/136) |
| 14% (504/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (157/21) |
| 24% (360/86) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (137/27) |